This approach can often scale better than JSF.
This has moved the Java to implementing the RESTful microservices. It is viewed as a legacy framework against today’s Javascript frameworks with RESTful API backend’s. There is a downside that it can be hard to deliver more complex requirements as the Request/Response model is more abstract under JSF.
ICEFACES TO PRIMEFACES MIGRATION PROFESSIONAL
It also has the advantage of allowing teams that are weak on front end skills to develop professional looking websites. The reason I like JSF is that you can access good quality components, that are mature and well documented. For the record I hate marmite, but I like JSF. Some people love it, some hate it, but there is no middle ground. Whats marmite? Its a yeast extract that you spread on toast. JSF is the marmite of frontend development.
But it has contributed to JSF being regarded as a difficult framework to use. There were rebuttals against this post particularly relating to more recent JSF versions. They do make the concession that the web model is getting more prominence in later versions of JSF. “encourages use of its own abstractions rather than fully embracing the underlying web model” The main part of the criticism was that the JSF model is flawed as it – In 2014 JSF received criticism from the thoughtworks techradar, which placed it on hold. The current release of JSF is 2.3, with the specification for 2.4 currently in progress. The deployment model is often simple, with a single war or ear file per server They let you quickly get started on projects, have plenty examples and are especially suited in a team or for projects where developers lack frontend skills. In particular PrimeFaces, or the utility libraries like omnifaces. Whats good about JSF?įor me the key strength of JSF lies in the component frameworks in the JSF ecosystem. It was the only frontend framework under Java EE until Java EE 8 added its new MVC framework. JSF is a component-based web framework that is part of Java EE. This post tries to understand the current state of JSF, and whether there is still a place for JSF in modern development. That said the level of questions is fairly small, and the level is relatively stable
0 kommentar(er)
